ITEDU 600: Curriculum Evaluation in Technical Education

Resources

___________________________________
 | CONCEPTS
| METHODS |  REPORTS | POLICY |  

OVERVIEW of EVALUATION

Burt, M.R., Harrell, A.V., Newmark, L.C., Aron, L.Y., & Jacobs, L.K. (1997). Evaluation guidebook. Project funded by S.T.O.P. Formula Grants under the Violence Against Women Act. Retrieved April 6, 2008, from http://www.jrsa.org/evaluationwebsite/guide/documents/stop1-4.html

Center for Creative Leadership. (n.d.). Leading Effectively Podcast Series [Audio]. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from http://www.ccl.org/leadership/podcast/transcriptValueofEvaluation.aspx

Confrey, J. (2006). Comparing and contrasting the National Research Council Report on evaluating curricular effectiveness with the What Works Clearinghouse Approach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(3). 195-213. Retrieved January 21, 2008, from http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/28/3/195

Duvall, J., Higgs, A., & Wolske, K. (2007). Evaluation: What is it and why do it? My Environmental Education Evaluation Resource Assistant. Retrieved July 21, 2008, from http://meera.snre.umich.edu/plan-an-evaluation/evaluation-what-is-it-and-why-do-it

Ericae.net is the Eric clearinghouse for assessment, evaluation and research information. The How-To Series, a set of on-line, full-text books and booklets addressing practical evaluation, research, measurement, and statistical issues, is extremely helpful.

Gajda, R. & Jewiss, J. (2004). Thinking about how to evaluate your program? These strategies will get you started. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(8). Retrieved January 21, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=8

Guba, E.G. (1973). The failure of educational evaluation. In Number Eleven, Evaluation of Education, The Educational Technology Reviews Series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

McNamara, C. (1997). Basic guide to program evaluation. Retrieved January 19, 2008, from http://www.managementhelp.org/evaluatn/fnl_eval.htm

Morrison, J. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation. BNJ, 326(7385), 385-487. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1125244&blobtype=pdf

Norris, N. (1998). Curriculum evaluation revisited. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(2). Retrieved March 28, 2005 from Academic Search Premier. (AN851432)

Patton, M. (2007). Qualitative evaluation checklist. The Evaluation Center. Western Michigan University. Retrieved July 12, 2007, from http://www.wmich.edu/~evalctr/checklists/qec/index.htm

Posavac, E.J. & Carey, R.G. (2007). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation (PARE) is an on-line journal. Its purpose is to provide education professionals access to refereed articles that can have a positive impact on assessment, research, evaluation, and teaching practice, especially at the local education agency (LEA) level.

Program development and evaluation. University of Wisconsin-Extension. Evaluation Publications are available at http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evaldocs.html

Scriven, M. (1973). The methodology of evaluation. In B.R. Worthen and J. Sanders, (Eds.), Educational evaluation:  Theory and practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Sowell, E. J. (2005). Curriculum: An integrated approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Spaulding, D.T. (2008). Program evaluation in practice: Core concepts and examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.

Willis, J. (1981). Democratization of curriculum evaluation. Educational Leadership, 38(8), 630-632. Retrieved March 28, 2005 from http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=9397127

The Evaluation Center located at Western Michigan University offers a Glossary Database.

W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (1998). W.K. Kellogg Foundation evaluation handbook. Retrieved April 3, 2008, form http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub770.pdf

__________________________________________________Top of Page

EVALUATION CONCEPTS

ACCOUNTABILITY

ERIC Clearinghouse for Junior Colleges. (1984). Educational accountability. ERIC Digest. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-926/educational.htm

Reeves, D. (2004). Accountability for learning: How teachers and school leaders can take charge. Chapter 1 available at ASCD.

ACCREDITATION

educationUSA.gov. (n.d.). Accreditation guide. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. Retrieved April 16, 2008, from http://educationusa.state.gov/accred.htm

Indiana Department of Education. (2008). Accreditation. Indiana Accountability System for Academic Progress, Indiana Department of Education. Retrieved May 28, 2008, from http://www.doe.in.gov/asap/accreditation.html

North Central Association Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement, Board of Trustees

U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Accreditation in the United States. Overview of accreditation. Financial Aid for Postsecondary Students. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation.html#Overvieew

 U.S. Department of Education Database of Accredited Postsecondary Institutions and Programs

ACTION RESEARCH

Merrill, C. (2004). Action research and technology education. The Technology Teacher, 63(8).

Mills, G.E. Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Stringer, E. (2004). Action research in education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

Wideman, R. (1999). The power of action research: Supporting professional learning through inquiry. The Ontario Action Researcher, 2(2). Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.nipissingu.ca/oar/archive-Vol2No2-V223E.htm

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGESS (AYP)

ED.gov (2002). Strategies for making Adequate Yearly Progress, Using curriculum based-measurement for progress monitoring. Presentations from the Student Achievement and School Accountability Conference, October 2002. Retrieved April 18, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/aypstr/edlite-index.html

ALIGNMENT

Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA). (2001). Curriculum alignment. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://www.pde.state.pa.us/a_and_t/lib/a_and_t/curriculumalignment.pdf

Association of College and Research Libraries & American Library Association. (n.d.). Analysis of instructional environments. Retrieved September 23, 2009, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/about/sections/is/projpubs/aie/instenvironments.pdf

ARTICULATION, Vertical

Scarborough, J.D. (n.d.). Articulation: An extended model and educational pathways to careers. Strategic Alliance to Advance Technological Education through Enhanced Mathematics, Science, Technology, and English Education at the Secondary Level. Northern Illinois University. Retrieved October 18, 2008, from http://www.ceet.niu.edu/orgs/nsfstali/frameset.html

CERTIFICATION, Qualification

Education

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards

Industry and Trades

American Welding Society

Cisco Career Certifications

CHANGE and DIFFUSION

Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1998). Chapter 3: The four levels: An overview. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

ETHICS and HUMAN SUBJECT PROTECTION

Ethical Standards of the American Educational Research Association (AERA)

American Evaluation Association (AEA) Guiding Principles for Evaluators

Title 45 Public Welfare, Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects

American Psychological Association (APA) 2002 Ethics Code (PDF))

The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). The program evaluation standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. [Summary available at http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc/PGMSTNDS-SUM.htm]

EVALUATION STANDARDS

Stufflebeam, D.L. (1999). Program evaluations metaevaluation checklist. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/program_metaeval.pdf

Gangopahdyay, P. (2002). Making the evaluation meaningful to all education stakeholders. [Checklist]. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/makingevalmeaningful.pdf

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

Comprehensive School Reform Quality Center from 2003 through 2006, through a grant to the American Institutes for Research from the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education of the U.S. Department of Education. CSRQ offers reviews and guidance on the effectiveness and quality of the leading comprehensive school reform (CSR) models..

The Center for Data Driven Reform in Education

National Staff Development Council provides several resources addressing data-driven decision-making.

Promising Practices Network

Social Programs That Work

What Works Clearinghouse

HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS (HQF)

ED.gov (2002). Highly qualified teachers and paraprofessionals. Presentations from the Student Achievement and School Accountability Conference, October 2002. Retrieved April 18, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/tchrqual/learn/hqt/edlite-index.html

LICENSURE

Resources of Indiana Department of Education including the Division of Professional Standards and Teacher Inquiry (database of individuals holding a teacher license in Indiana).

MAPPING

ATLAS MAPS at the American Association for the Advancement of Science

Burn, R.C. (2001). Curriculum mapping. Curriculum Handbook. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved August 21, 2007, from ASCD.

Curriculum Mapper presents "What is curriculum mapping?"

DMAC Solutions provides several examples of reports which are generated from mapping databases at http://www.dmac-solutions.net/state/help/html/TAKS/Reports/Instructional/TAKS_Instructional_Reports_Examples.htm

Glencoe/McGraw-Hill offers a Curriculum Mapping Primer at http://www.glencoe.com/sec/teachingtoday/educationupclose.phtml/35

Fayette County Public School's Curriculum Map and Framework

Least Tern's What is Curriculum Mapping?

Teach Resources. (2008). Curriculum mapping. CurriculumMapping101.com. Retrieved August 29, 2008, from http://www.curriculummapping101.com/Curriculum_Mapping.html

EXAMPLES:

Brighton Central School in Kentucky offers several maps, e.g., Technology 9 Communications and Technology Grade 8

MERIT and WORTH

Stufflebeam, D.L. (2001). Evaluation values and criteria checklist. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/values_criteria.pdf

 QUESTIONS

Online Evaluation Resource Library (OERL). (n.d.). Curriculum Development Annotated Plan Excerpts. OERL: Plans: Curriculum Development. Retrieved April 14, 2008, from hhttp://oerl.sri.com/plans/cd/planCD_eo.html

Shadish, W. (1998). Some evaluation questions. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluationn, 6(3). Retrieved January 21, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=3

The University of Texas Medical Branch offers explanations of three types of research questions (descriptive, relationship, and comparison) at http://www.sahs.utmb.edu/pellinore/Intro_to_research/wad/design.htm.

Marzano, R. J. (1996). Eight questions about implementing standards-based education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 5(6). Retrieved April 12, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=6

STANDARDS

Alexandra Beatty, Rapporteur, Committee on State Standards in Education: A Workshop Series, National Research Council. (2008). Common standards for K-12 education?: Considering the evidence: Summary of a Workshop Series.  National Academies Press. Retrieved September 2, 2008, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12462

VARIABLES

Professor Jon'a Meyer's RealPresenter streaming slide explains independent, dependent, intervening, and moderating variables. This 16-minute multimedia presentation is called Variables in Social Science Research. It is located at http://www.camden.rutgers.edu:8080/ramgen/jfmeyer/mc-film04/trainer.smi and requires the RealMedia player. The player is available as a download from http://www.real.com///a> 

VALIDITY

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development presents Sources of Bias and Protections from Bias

Winter, G. (2000). Comparative discussion of the notion of 'Validity' in qualitative and quantitative research. The Qualitative Report, 4, (3 & 4). Retrieved March 31, 2006, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/winter.html

 

__________________________________________________Top of Page

APPROACHES, MODELS, & METHODS of EVALUATION

ADVOCACY and POLICY CHANGE EVALUATION

Patton, M.Q. (2008). Advocacy impact evaluation. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 5(9). Retrieved April 8, 2008, from hhttp://survey.ate.wmich.edu/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/159/181

APPROACHES or MODELS

Bell, E.J. & Dudley, R,J. (1998). Elements of effective curriculum evaluation: An analysis of a Queensland model of curriculum evaluation. Paper presented at ‘Framing the Future’, the September 1999 Biennial Conference of the Australian Curriculum Studies Association. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from http://www.acsainc.com.au/content/99_bell_elements.pdf

Stufflebeam, D.L. (1999). Foundational models for 21st Century program evaluation. Occasional Papers Series. The Evaluation Center. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/pubs/ops/ops16.html

CIPP (context, input, process, and product)

Stufflebeam, D.L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Daniel L. Stufflebeam, George F. Madause, & Thomas Kellaghan (Eds) Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Stufflebeam, D.L. (2000). CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist. The Evaluation Center Western Michigan University. Retrieved August 29, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cippchecklist.htm">hhttp://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cippchecklist.htm

Stufflebeam, D.L. (2003). CIPP Evaluation model checklist: A tool for applying the Fifth Installment of the CIPP Model to assess long-term enterprises. The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cippchecklist.htm

PowerPoint Overview prepared by Federal Railroad Administration, Department of Transportation.

Students in the Conflict Management Program at The Johns Hopkins University School for Advanced International Studies. (n.d.). Evaluation approaches. The Conflict Management Toolkit. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://www.sais-jhu.edu/cmtoolkit/issues/evaluation/approaches.html

U.S. Department of Education. (2004). New directions for program evaluation at the U.S. Department of Education. Author. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2002/04/evaluation.html

Science Program Improvement Review.

Jadaus, G.F. & Kellaghan, T. (2000). Models, metaphors, and definitions in evaluation. In Daniel L. Stufflebeam, George F. Madause, & Thomas Kellaghan (Eds) Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sander, J. (1988). Approaching evaluation in small schools. ERIC Digest. Las Cruces, NM: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED296816)

Utterback, Ph., H., and Kalin, M. (1989). A community-based model of curriculum evaluation. Educational Leadership, 77(2), 490-50. Retrieved March 28, 2005 from http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=8523771

ASSESSMENT: AUTHENTIC or PERFORMANCE

Hoepfl, M. (2007). Alternative classroom assessment tools and scoring mechanisms (p. 65-86). Marie Hoepfl & Michael R. Lindstrom (Eds.). (2007). Assessment of technology education. 56th Yearbook Council on Technology Teacher Education. Woodland Hills, CA: McGraw Hill.

Kimball, R. (2007). Assessment of design and technology in the U.K.: International approaches to assessment. Marie Hoepfl & Michael R. Lindstrom (Eds.). (2007). Assessment of technology education. 56th Yearbook Council on Technology Teacher Education. Woodland Hills, CA: McGraw Hill.

Mueller, J. (2008). Authentic assessment toolbox [Tutorial]. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/howdoyoudoit.htm

Pinellas School District & The Florida Center for Instructional Technology. (n.d.). Performance assessment. Classroom Assessment [Tutorial]. University of South Florida: Authors. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://fcit.usf.edu/assessment/performance/assess.html

Stiggins, R.J. (2000). Specifications for a performance-based assessment system for teacher preparation. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. Retrieved October 14, 2008, from http://www.ncate.org/documents/articles/stiggins.pdf

ASSESSMENT PLAN

Office of Academic Assessment and Institutional Research. Ball State University. (1999). Designing a department assessment plan. Ball State University. Retrieved October 21, 2009, from  http://web.bsu.edu/IRAA/AA/WB/chapter1.htm

Palomba, C.A., & Banta, T.W. (1999). Assessment essentials. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Includes a section on evaluating the assessment plan.]

ASSESSMENT: STUDENT

Baker, C.E. (2000). Chapter 8: Evaluating students. The Teaching Assistant Experience.. Andrew P. Haley & Joanne M. Nicoll (Eds.). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, CIDDE. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.cidde.pitt.edu/ta/ta_handbook/

Bradley, K.D. Cunningham, J.D., & Sampson, S. (2007). Evaluating and restructuring science assessments: An example measuring student's conceptual understanding of heat. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago, IL. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://www.uky.edu/~kdbrad2/BradleyCunninghamSampsonAERA2007_3_29_07.pdf

Hearne, J. (2001). Assessment as a tool for learning. New Horizons for Learning. Retieved October 26, 2008, from http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/assess/hearne.htm

Hoepfl, M. Lindstrom, M.R. (Eds.). (2007). Assessment of technology education. 56th Yearbook Council on Technology Teacher Education.Woodland Hills, CA: McGraw Hill.

McMillan, J. H. (2007).  Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction, 4/E. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon

Shindler, J. (n.d.). Week #10: Pre-reading for workshop related to improving classroom climate and student achievement by formally assessing participation and process. Classroom Management Resource Site. California State University. Retrieved October 25, 2008, from http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/jshindl/cm/index.htm

Stiggins, R. (2008, April). Assessment manifesto: A call for the development of balanced assessment systems. ETS Assessment Training Institute. Retrieved October 25, 2008, from http://www.assessmentinst.com/forms/AssessManifesto-08.pdf

Stiggins, R. J. & Conklin N. J. (1992). In teachers’ hands: Investigating the practice of classroom assessment. Albany NY: SUNY Press.

Wichita Area Technical College. (2007). Assessment handbook. Author. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://www.watc.edu/user/file/ie_AssessmentHandbook_011508.pdf

See below:  AUTHENTIC, RUBRIC , PERFORMANCE

TESTS

Planning an effective test. Retrieved October 21, 2009, from http://www.yorktech.com/department/instruction_dev/TeachLearn/Planning_Effective_Test.htm

CASE STUDY

Davey, Lynn (1991). The application of case study evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(9). Retrieved January 21, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=9

hhttp://www.aare.edu.au/93pap/taylp93313.txt

CHECKLISTS

Stufflebeam, D.L. (1999). Program evaluations metaevaluation checklist. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/program_metaeval.pdf

Gangopahdyay, P. (2002). Making the evaluation meaningful to all education stakeholders. [Checklist]. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/makingevalmeaningful.pdf

CURRICULUM EVALUATION

Hughes, P. (2001). The monitoring and evaluation of curriculum reforms. Final report. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/curriculum/GulfStatesProjectsPdf/omanIIhug.pdf

DOCUMENT ANALYSIS

Newton, D.P. & Newton, L.D. (2007). An analysis of primary technology textbooks: Can they support cause and purpose explanations? Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2). 199-210. Abstract retrieved October 22, 2008, from ERIC. (EJ763505) 

EVALUABILITY ASSESSMENT

Trevisan, M. S. & Yi Min Huang. (2003). Evaluability assessment: A primer. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluationn, 8(20). Retrieved April 12, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=20

IMPACT EVALUATION

Asian Development Bank. (2006). Impact evaluation: Methodological and operational issues. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.adb.org/Documents/Handbooks/Impact-Analysis/Impact-Analysis.pdf

Doppelt, Y. (2005). Assessment of project-based learning in a mechatronics context. Journal of Technology Educationn, 16(2). Retrieved September 13, 2008, from Virginia Tech’s Digital Library and Archives.

METHODS

GENERAL OVERVIEW

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005). Section 3. Methods of Evaluation. Demonstrating your programs worth: A Primer on Evaluation for Programs to Prevent Unintentional Injury. Author. Retrieved April 14, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/pub-res/dypw/02_introduction.htm

Sanders, J.R., & Davidson, E.J. (2003). Checklists and tools for use in school evaluation. Supplementary materials for use with a model for school evaluation.  In D.L. Stufflebeam & T.E. Kallaghan (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation. Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Available at http://evaluation.wmich.edu/resources/schooleval/

Scriven, M. (2000, rev. 2007). The logic and methodology of checklists. Western Michigan University. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/papers/logic&methodology_dec07.pdff

CONCEPT INVENTORIES

Richardson, J. (2004). Concept inventories: Tools for uncovering STEM students' misconceptions. Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

COST ANALYSIS

Sewell, M. & Marczak, M. (n.d.). Using cost analysis in evaluation. CYFERnet-Evaluation. The University of Arizona, Tucson Arizona. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from http://ag.arizona.edu/fcs/cyfernet/cyfar/Costben2.htm

DOCUMENT REVIEW

Peterson, D.J. (n.d.). Using existing records in evaluation. CYFERnet-Evaluation. The University of Arizona. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://ag.arizona.edu/fcs/cyfernet/cyfar/Exisrec5.htmm

Marczak, M. & Sewell, M. (n.d.). Using focus groups for evaluation. CYFERnet-Evaluation. The University of Arizona. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://ag.arizona.edu/fcs/cyfernet/cyfar/focus.htmm

GEM: GENERAL ELIMINATION METHOD

Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluationn, 5(9). Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://survey.ate.wmich.edu/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/159/181

INSTRUMENTS

Baker, Frank (2001). The basics of item response theory [Online version]. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Retrieved October 1, 2008, from http://echo.edres.org:8080/irt/baker/

http://www.citt.ufl.edu/toolbox/toolbox_examsQuizzes.php

Cheung, D., & BUcat, R. (2002). How can we construct good multiple-choice items?  Paper presented at the Science and Technology Education Conference, Hong Kong. June 20-21, 2002. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://www3.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/chemistry/files/constructMC.pdf

Duvall, K. (n.d.). Improving your test questions. Measurement and Evaluation: Center for Teaching Excellence. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://www.oir.uiuc.edu/dme/exams/ITQ.html

Scarborough, J.D. (n.d.). Student performance assessment. Strategic Alliance to Advance Technological Education through Enhanced Mathematics, Science, Technology, and English Education at the Secondary Level. Northern Illinois University. Retrieved October 18, 2008, from http://www.ceet.niu.edu/orgs/nsfstali/Student_Performance_Assessment.htm

INTERVIEW

Colker, A.M. (n.d.). Developing interviews: Preparing an interview protocol. [Tutorial] Professional Development Module. Online Evaluation Resource Library (OERL). Available at http://oerl.sri.com/module/mod6/m6_p1.html

CYFERnet-Evaluation. The University of Arizona. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://ag.arizona.edu/fcs/cyfernet/cyfar/Intervu5.htmm

EXAMPLES of Interview Protocol

(OERL) (n.d.). Teacher / Faculty Interviews. Curriculum Development Instruments. [Example of Interview Protocols]. Retrieved April 15, 2008, from http://oerl.sri.com/instruments/cd/teachintrv/instr4.htmll

Colker, A.M. (n.d.). Developing observation instruments: Selecting an observation approach [Tutorial]. Professional Development Modulee. Online Evaluation Resource Library. Available at http://oerl.sri.com/module/mod10/m10_p1.html

ITEM ANALYSIS

Baker, F. (2001). The basics of item response theory [Online version]. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Retrieved October 1, 2008, from http://echo.edres.org:8080/irt/baker/

Devine, M. & Yaghlian, N. (n.d.). Analysis of testing (p. 5). Office of Instructional Support, Cornell University. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://www.cte.cornell.edu/campus/teach/faculty/Materials/TestConstructionManual.pdf

Duvall, K. (n.d.). Test item performance: The item analysis. Measurement and Evaluation: Center for Teaching Excellence. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://www.oir.uiuc.edu/dme/exams/item.html

Hewitt-Gervais, C., Bevins, T., Volety, & Mayfield, G. (2000). Report on the validation of: the student evaluation of instruction instrument. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://fgcu.edu/planning/StudentAssessment/FacultyInfo/Validation.html

Scoring Office, Academic Technology Services. (n.d.) Introduction to item analysis. Michigan State University: Author. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from https://www.msu.edu/dept/soweb/itanhand.html

Wise, J-M. (n.d.). Item Analysis: Techniques to improve test items and instruction [PowerPoint]. Center for Assessment and Testing, Florida State University . Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://learningforlife.fsu.edu/cat/scanning/docs/ItemAnalysis.ppt

OBSERVATION PROTOCOL

Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Falconer, K., Turley, J. Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2000). Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). ACEPT IN-003. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://physicsed.buffalostate.edu/AZTEC/RTOP/RTOP_full/index.htm

Texas Collaborative for Excellence in Teacher Preparation. (2002). Classroom observation protocol. Author. Retrieved October 13, 2008, from  http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phys4810/phys4810_fa06/protocols/ClassObProt2002.pdf

PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT

CYFERnet-Evaluation. The University of Arizona. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://ag.arizona.edu/fcs/cyfernet/cyfar/Portfo~3.htm

RUBRIC

Facione, P.A. & Facione, N.C. (1994). Holistic critical thinking scoring rubric. California Academic Press. Retrieved October 14, 2008, from http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/rubric.pdf

IDE Corporation. (2002). Rubric to assess a PBL and rubric. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from http://www.idecorp.com/assessrubric.pdf

Instructional Materials Service, Texas A&M University. (n.d.). Rubric toolkit for agricultural science and technology education. Retrieved October 14, 2008, from http://www-ims.tamu.edu/docs2/Rubrics2004.pdf

Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance assessments and scoring rubrics. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(14). Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=14

Pinellas School District & The Florida Center for Instructional Technology. (n.d.). Performance assessment. Classroom Assessment [Tutorial]. University of South Florida: Authors. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://fcit.usf.edu/assessment/performance/assess.htmll

http://www.relearning.org/resources/PDF/rubric_sampler.pdf

Scarborough, J.D. (n.d.). Student performance assessment. Strategic Alliance to Advance Technological Education through Enhanced Mathematics, Science, Technology, and English Education at the Secondary Level. Northern Illinois University. Retrieved October 18, 2008, from http://www.ceet.niu.edu/orgs/nsfstali/Student_Performance_Assessment.htmm

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) (otherwise known as the nation's report card) reports results for student achievement at grades 4, 8, and 12 in a nationwide sample.

Vu, P. (2008, January 17). Do state tests make the grade? Stateline.org. Retrieved April 18, 2008, from, http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=272382

SURVEYS and QUESTIONNAIRES

Pinellas School District & The Florida Center for Instructional Technology. (n.d.). Attitude surveys. Classroom Assessment [Tutorial]. University of South Florida: Authors. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://fcit.usf.edu/assessment/attitude/survey.html

Colker, A.M. (n.d.). Developing written questionnaires: Questionnaire design [Tutorial]. Professional Development Module. Online Evaluation Resource Library. Available at http://oerl.sri.com/module/mod3/m3_p1.html

Colker, A.M. (n.d.). Developing written questionnaires: Administering written questionnaires [Tutorial]. Professional Development Module. Online Evaluation Resource Library. Available at http://oerl.sri.com/module/mod5/m5_p1.html

Zalles, D.R., (n.d.). Developing written questionnaires: Determining if questionnaires should be used [Tutorial]. Professional Development Module. Online Evaluation Resource Library. Available at http://oerl.sri.com/module/mod1/m1_p1.html

Zalles, D.R., (n.d.). Developing written questionnaires: Writing questionnaires [Tutorial]. Professional Development Module. Online Evaluation Resource Library. Available at http://oerl.sri.com/module/mod2/m2_p1.html

TESTS, EXAMS, & QUIZZES

CYFERnet-Evaluation: Evaluation tools and Instruments

Simkin, M.G. & Kuechler, W.L. (2005). Multiple-choice tests and student understanding: What is the connection? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1). Retrieved October 18, 2008, from http://www.business.unr.edu/faculty/kuechler/cv/DSJIE.3.1.05.pdf

See also ASSESSMENT: STUDENT

NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Department of Public Instruction, North Dakota. (n.d.). Needs assessment [Definition and Steps in Conducting]. Author. Retrieved April 3, 2008, from http://www.dpi.state.nd.us/grants/needs.pdf

Posavac, E.J. & Carey, R.G. (2007). Chapter 6: The assessment of need. Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Peake, J.B., Duncan, D.W., & Ricketts, J.C. (2000). Identifying technical training needs of Georgia agriculture teachers. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 23 (1). 44-54. Retrieved September 2, 2008, from Virginia Tech’s Digital Library and Archives.

Purdue University Libraries Technology Training Team. (2002). How to conduct needs assessment. Purdue University. Retrieved March 31, 2008 from http://gemini.lib.purdue.edu/staffdev/handouts/needsassess.doc

Quellmalz, E., Schank, P., Hinojosa, T.,  & Padilla, C. (1999). Performance assessment links in science. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(10). Retrieved April 12, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=10

Rouda, R. & Kusy, M.E. (1995). Needs assessment, Development of human resources, Part 2art 2. Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Retrieved March 31, 2008, from http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~rouda/T2_NA.html

http://www.worcester.k12.md.us/media/Needs_Assessments.pdf.

PARTICIPATORY EVALUATION

Aubel, J. (1999). Participatory program evaluation manual, 2nd Ed. Child Survival Technical Support Project. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://www.childsurvival.com/documents/PEManual.pdf

Rossman, G.B. (n.d). Participatory monitoring & evaluation. The Center for International Education, School of Education, University of Massachusetts. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from  http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/alr26/parEval.html

U.S. Agency for International Development. (1996). Conducting a participatory evaluation. Performance Monitoring and Evaluation TIPS, 1.Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://www.childsurvival.com/documents/PEManual.pdf

Zuzoski, A., & Luluquisen, M. (2002). Participatory evaluation: What is it? Why do it? What are the challenges? Policy & Practice, 55. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/Evaluation.pdf

Laurel County Public Schools. (2007). Certified personnel evaluation plan. Retrieved April 12, 2008, fromhttp://www.laurel.k12.ky.us/District%20Resources/Certified%20Evaluation%20Plans/Policies.pdf

East Baton Rouge Parish School Board. (2006). Personnel accountability plan: Certificated and profession. Author. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://humanresources.ebrschools.org/eduWEB1/1000012/docs/hr_final_personnel_plan_4-06.doc

http://www.ed.gov/teachers/nclbguide/improve-quality.html

WestEd. (2001). Teacher assessment and professional development.  Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://www.wested.org/asds/profdev.shtml

See also Certification

PROCESS Evaluation

Banilower, E.R., Boyd, S. E., Pasley, J. D., & Weiss, I. R. (2006). The LSC capstone report: Lessons from a decade of mathematics and science reform. Chapel Hill, NC; Horizon Research, Inc. Retrieved April 14, 2008, from http://www.pdmathsci.net/reports/capstone.pdf

Bond, S. L.; Boyd, S. E. & Rapp, K.A. (1997). Taking stock: A practical guide to evaluating your own programs. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://www.horizon-research.com/reports/1997/stock.pdf

Wholey, J.S., & McLaughlin, J.A. (1998). An evaluation workshop on planning and constructing performance-based evaluationss. Transcript of the Project Directors' Annual Meeting. Washington, DC. Retrieved April 13, 2008, from http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/sped/tri/evalwkshp.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005). Demonstrating your programs worth: A primer on evaluation for programs to prevent unintentional injury. Retrieved April 14, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/pub-res/dypw/02_introduction.htm

PROPOSAL Evaluation

Online Evaluation Resource Library http://oerl.sri.com/plans/planscrit.html

__________________________________________________Top of Page

DATABASES, JOURNALS, and INFORMATION PROVIDERS

The Association for Career and Technical Education (ACTE)

Cooperative Educational Service Agendy (CESA) Agency 10

CYFERnet: Children, Youth and Families Education and Research Network

Ericae.net: Assessment & Evaluation on the Internett is a clearinghouse for assessment, evaluation and research information. The How-To Series, a set of on-line, full-text books and booklets addressing practical evaluation, research, measurement, and statistical issues, is extremely helpful.

The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.

National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)

Career and Technical Education in the United States: 1990-2005

Online Evaluation Resource Library (OERL) provides access to evaluation plans, instruments, and reports for projects supported by theee National Science Foundation.

U.S. Department of Education

National Center for Education Statistics, Career/Technical Education

JOURNALS

American Journal of Evaluation

Australasian Digital Theses Program

Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation. Available at http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jmde/content/JMDE_002_full.pdf or http://survey.ate.wmich.edu/jmde/index.php/jmde_1

Journal of Curriculum Studies

EVALUATION COURSES

Instructional Systems Technology Department, Indiana University. (). R561: Evaluation and change. Retrieved October 21, 2009, from https://www.indiana.edu/~istr561/knuth08spring/index.shtml

Khirallah, B. (2007). EDU 5352: Educational evaluation. University of Dallas. Retrieved October 13, 2008, from  http://dante.udallas.edu/edu5352/

Knuth, R.A. (2006, Spring). R561, Evaluation and Change in the Instructional Development Process. Instructional Systems Technology Department. Retrieved April 11, 2008, form http://www.indiana.edu/~istr561/knuth/unit1print.html

Ritz, J. (2005). OTED785/885. Old Dominion University. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.odu.edu/~jritz/oted885/ntg12.shtml

Wicklein, R.C. (n.d.). ECOCS 7200: Evaluation of programs in occupational programs. The University of Georgia. Retrieved March 30, 2008, from http://www.coe.uga.edu/syllabus/eocs/EOCS_7200_wickleinr_SP04.pdf

Sharma, R. (2001). Curriculum designing. Unit 4. Madhya Pradesh Bhoj (Open) University, Bhopal. Retrieved August 24, 2008, from http://www.bhojvirtualuniversity.com/ss/online_cou/b_ed/secp_03/cp3b2u4con.asp

Burns, M. (n.d.). Evaluation in FCS 5470. Family and Consumer Science. Eastern Illinois University. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.eiu.edu/~mburns/fcs5470///

__________________________________________________Top of Page

CTE Programs: Post Secondary

Bureau of Career Development, New Hampshire Department of Education. (2006). Checklist for evaluating Regional Career and Technical Education Centers and Programs. New Hampshire Department of Education. Retrieved March 30, 2008, from http://www.ed.state.nh.us/education/doe/organization/adultlearning/Career%20Development/documents/CenterEval_000.doc

The Pennsylvania State Board for Vocational Technical Education. (2006). The accreditation of public postsecondary programs and institutions in Career and Technical Education: Handbook for approval, evaluation, accreditation, and audit procedures of public postsecondary programs. Harrisburg, PA: The Pennsylvania State Board for Vocational Technical Education. Retrieved March 30, 2008, from

CTE Programs: Secondary

Indiana Department of Workforce Development. (2008, March 27). Indiana State Plan: FY 2009-2013 (July 1, 2008-June 30, 2013). Indiana Department of Education. Retrieved April 22, 2008, from http://www.in.gov/dwd/files/Final_Perkins_5_Year_State_Plan.pdf

U.S. Department of Education. (2003). National Assessment of Vocational Education (NAVE). Retrieved July 21, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/sectech/nave/evalplan/index.html

GENERAL PROCESS

The Baldridge National Quality Program (2008). Education Criteria for Performance Excellence. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce. Gathersburg, M. Retrieved April 21, 2008 from http://www.quality.nist.gov/PDF_files/2008_Education_Criteria.pdff

Fournier, D. M. (Ed.). (1995). Reasoning in evaluation: Inferential links and leaps. New Directions for Evaluation, 48,

Sanders, J.R., & Davidson, E.J. (2003). Checklists and tools for use in school evaluation. Supplementary materials for use with a model for school evaluation.  In D.L. Stufflebeam & T.E. Kallaghan (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation. Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Available at http://evaluation.wmich.edu/resources/schooleval/

Sanders, J.R., & Davidson, E.J. (2003). Checklists and tools for use in school evaluation. Supplementary materials for use with a model for school evaluation.  In D.L. Stufflebeam & T.E. Kallaghan (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation. Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Available at http://evaluation.wmich.edu/resources/schooleval//

FACILITIES

Criteria for the design and evaluation of technology education facilities: A study involving the development and trial of appropriate design criteria. Unpublished masters thesis. Australasian Digital Theses Program. Retrieved January 26, 2008, from http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20050906.132938/index.html

INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT

Quality criteria for instruments.

Test Management Councils, Institute for Certification of Computer Professionals. (2004). Handbook for ICCP Item Writers. Retrieved February 11, 2008, from http://www.iccp.org/iccpnew/iwg2.htmlll

LOGIC MODELS

McNamara, C. (2008). Guidelines and framework for designing basic logic model. Free Management Library. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://www.managementhelp.org/evaluatn/lgc_mdl.htm

Logic Models: The basics. [Tutorial]. Retrieved August 28, 2008, form http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/dashoet/logic_model_1/index.html

PLANNING

Ventura County strategic plan for environmental education. Southen California Wetlands Recovery Project. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://wwwstatic.kern.org/gems/region8/draftstrategicplanapp.pdfff

College of Medicine. (2005). Exhibit 6-Evaluation of the medical curriculum. University of Florida. http://www.med.ufl.edu/oea/cc/exhibits/evalofcurriculum.shtml

Rockman ET AL. and the Edventure Group. (2006). Evaluation Springboard [Tutorial]. Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.evaluationspringboard.org/getstrt-2.html

Greater Kalamazoo Evaluation Task Force. (1997). Evaluation for learning: A basic guide to program evaluation for arts, culture, and health & human service organizations. Greater Kalamazoo Evaluation Project. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from

Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1998). Chapter 3: The four levels: An overview. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

My Environmental Education Evaluation Resource Assistantt (MEERA) is an online "evaluation consultant" created to assist you with your evaluation needs.

Newcomer, J.L. (n.d). Program assessment: Long range plans and preliminary results. Engineering Technology Department o, Western Washington University. Retrieved October 21, 2009, from http://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/cii/resources/outcomes/et_plan.pdf

Online Evaluation Resource Library.(n.d.) Alignment table for plan components. nts. Online Evaluation Resource Library. Retrieved July 21, 2008, from http://oerl.sri.com/plans/alignment/plansalign.html

Radnor Township School Board. (2008, February 28). Curriculum development and program evaluation process. Radnor Township School District. Retrieved April 8, 2008, http://www.rtsd.org/Curriculum/Curriculum%20Development%20and%20Program%20Evaluation%20Process%20Board%20Document%20022608.pdf

http://learningstore.uwex.edu/Planning-a-Program-Evaluation--P1033C0.aspx

Zalles, D.R. (n.d.). Designing an evaluation: Methodological approach and sampling.  [Tutorial] Professional Development Module. Online Evaluation Resource Library. Available at http://oerl.sri.com/module/mod4/m4_p1.html

DATA ANALYSIS

QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS

Hoepfl, M. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 47-63. Retrieved on June 16, 2003, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/pdf/hoepfl.pdf

Saveyne, W.C. & Robinson, R.S. (2001). Qualitative research issues and methods: An introduction for educational technologists (Chapter 40). In David H. Jonassen (Ed.) The Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technologyy. The Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved November 1, 2008, from http://www.aect.org/edtech/ed1/

QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS

Taylor-Powell, E. (1996). Analyzing quantitative data. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. University of Wisconsin-Extension. (G3658-6). Retrieved November 11, 2008, from http://learningstore.uwex.edu/pdf/G3658-6.pdf

DATA COLLECTION

Taylor-Powell, E., & Steele, S. (1996). Collecting evaluation data: An overview of sources and methods. University of Wisconsin-Extension. (G3658-4) Available at http://learningstore.uwex.edu/pdf/G3658-4.pdf

EXAMPLES

Foertsch (1998) example of data collection methods used to evaluate a reading program.

__________________________________________________Top of Page

CURRICULUM MATERIALS

Slavin, R.R. What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Features: Perspectives on Evidence-Based Research in Education. Educational Researcher, 377(1), 5-14.

EVIDENCE-BASED MATERIALS

"What Works Clearinghouse was established in 2002 by the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences to provide educators, policymakers, researchers, and the public with a central and trusted source of scientific evidence of what works in education."

TECHNOLOGY-Based Curriculum

Reed, D.S. & McNergnedy, R.F. (2000). Evaluating technology-based curriculum materials. ERIC Digest. Retrieved December 30, 2007, from http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/based.htm (ERIC Document No. ED449118)

__________________________________________________Top of Page

REPORTS: Evaluation

Armstrong, R., Drake, T., Cunningham, J., & Arevalo, C.L. (1996). Mathematics program evaluation grades K-12. Des Moines, IA: Des Moines Independent Community School District. (ERIC Document No. ED412101)

Demiraslan, Y. (2008, March). Investigating the propriety of a science and technology curriculum in Turkiye. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. NY: New York City, March 24-28, 2008. (ERIC Document Reproduction Number ED500714)

Goldfeder, E., & Ross, S.M. (2003). Evaluation report: Year 2 implementation of the Small High Schools Initiative, Manual Complex, Denver, Coloradoo. Center for Research in Educational Policy. (ERIC Document Reproduction NO: ED500021)

Owens, T.R. (1980). Evaluation of the ECC/GT programs in Jefferson County Public Schools. Northwest Regional Education Lab. (Eric Document No. ED219627)

Program development and evaluation. University of Wisconsin-Extension. Evaluation Reports are available at http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluationreports/index.html

Watson, D.G., Pense, S.L., Harrison, T.V., & Steffen, R. (2005). Introducing electronic systems concepts using old computers. Journal of Agricultural Systems, Technology, and Management, 20. Retrieved October 28, 2008, from http://www.usu.edu/aste/jastm/past20.htm

Western Michigan University's The Evaluation Center houses several evaluation reports at http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/pubs/ecpub.htm#Evaluation%20Reports

CAREER and TECHNICAL

Career and Technical Education in the United States: 1990-2005

EDUCATIONAL REFORM

Class-size Reduction Program: Final Report. Prepared for U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Deputy Secretary, Policy and Program Studies Service. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/other/class-size/report.pdf

Innabi and Sheikh (2007) ...

ENGINEERING

Project Lead the Way. (2008). Introduction to Engineering DesignTM: Analysis of cognitive levels of learning and mathematics and science content. Author. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from http://www.pltw.org/downloads/Engineering/2008-IED-Depth-of-Knowledge-Analysis-final.doc

ENVIRONMENTAL Programs

Volk, R.L., & Cheak, M.J. (2003). The effects of an environmental education program on students, parents, and community. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(4), 12-25. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. EJ770045)

NCLB: Accountability

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development offers a list of evaluation reports addressing NCLB at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.htmll

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. (2008). State and local implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act Volume IV—Title I School choice and supplemental educational services: Interim report. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 18, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/choice/nclb-choice-ses/nclb-choice-ses.pdf

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Science and Mathematics Program Improvement (SAMPI), Institute for Science Education, Western Michigan University. (2001). Review and assessment of the Michigan Eisenhower Professional Development Program. October 1999-June 2001. Report prepared for the Michigan Department of Education. Retrieved March 31, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/~sampi/ikereport.html

STUDENT-GENERATED REPORTS

Lighthouse, S. (2005). Analysis and critique of a nursing curriculum N309, Professional Development II. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http:www.vancouver.wsu.edu/programs/nurs/portfolios/lighthouse/...Curriculum%20Analysis.doc

TEACHER QUALITY

Goe, L, & Bell, C., Little, O., & ETS.  (2008, June). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved September 21, 2009, from http://www.tqsource.org/publications/EvaluatingTeachEffectiveness.pdf

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education. (2006). The secretary's fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 18, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/teachprep/2006-title2report.pdf

Learning Point Associates. (2007, 2004). Understanding the No Child Left Behind Act: Teacher quality. quick key 6. Retrieved September 22, 2009, from http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/qkey6.pdf

STEM Programs and Curricula

American Society for Engineering Education. (1972). Engineering Technology Education Study. Author. National Science Foundation (Project No. GY6898). (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED059664)

Eighmy, M.A. & Tews, B.D. (2006 ). Report on a two-year college farm management/agricultural mechanics curriculum review. Agriculture Program, North Dakota State College of Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction NO: ED491542)

Engineering is Elementary curriculum has undergone considerable evaluation, including...

Lachapelle, D.P., & Cunningham, C.M. (2007). Engineering is elementary: Children's changing understandings of science and engineering. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved January 25, 2008, from http://www.mos.org/eie/pdf/research/asee_2007_students_understandings.pdf

Lam, P., Doverspike, D., Zhao, J., Zhe, J., & Menzemer, C. (2008). An evaluation of a STEM program for middle school students on learning disability related IEPs. Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). Retrieved July 5, 2008, from http://ojs.jstem.org/index.php?journal=JSTEM&page=article&op=view&path[]=1427&path[]=1223

Merrill, C., Custer, R., Daugherty, J., Westrick, M., & Zeng, Y. (2007). Delivering core engineering concepts to secondary level students. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, AC 2007-173. Retrieved October 3, 2008, from http://www.asee.org/acPapers/AC%202007Full1732.pdf

Terman, F.E., & Higdon, A. (1971). A study of engineering and engineering technology education in Florida. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED078801)

__________________________________________________Top of Page

STATE, NATION, POLICY and DEMOCRACY

Visscher, R.S. (2007). Evaluation as the conscience of freedom and democracy. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 4(7). Retrieved April  7, 2008, from http://survey.ate.wmich.edu/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/11/19

Danaher, P.A. (1996). Evaluation and the democratic alternative: Problems of the past and 
partnerships for the future. Paper presented at the ERA and ARRE Conference. Singapore. Retrieved April 9, 2008, from http://www.aare.edu.au/96pap/johns96146.txt

EUROPE

Eurydice. (2004). Evaluation of schools providing compulsory education in Europe. Russels: Eurydice. Retrieved November 11, 2008, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/Eurydice/showPresentation?pubid=042EN (ISBN 2-87116-364-2)

Muñoz-Repiso, M.,  Murillo, F.J.,  Valle, J.M., &  García, R. (n.d.). Comparative study of the reforms at compulsory education level in the European Union and the EFTA/EEA countries (1984-94). Eurydice. Retrieved March 18, 2006, from http://www.eurydice.org/documents/ref/en/reen18.htm

U.S. Federal

POLICY

Public Law 107-110 The Elementary and Secondary Education Act as reauthorized by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

Public Law 109-270 The Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act (Authorized August 12, 2006)

U.S. Department of Education

Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development

National Center for Education Statistics

National Assessment of Educational Progress

Policy and Program Studies Service

U.S. STATE-Level Examples

Barron, G.O., & Hill, M. (2002). Instructions for submission of institutional core curriculum evaluation reports [Memo]. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/reports/PDF/0912.PDF

STANDARDS CTE

Duchworth, R. (2005). Program standards: Career and technical education. Olympia, Washington: Career and Technical Education, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from http://www.k12.wa.us/CareerTechEd/pubdocs/OSPI-CTE-ProgramStandards-May2005New.pdf

Indiana Department of Education. (2003). Indiana standards for career and technical programs. Indiana Department of Education. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from http://www.doe.state.in.us/standards/careerandtech.html

__________________________________________________Top of Page

TOOLS:  Computer-based

rGRADE (Fall 2004)

Program Report for the Preparation of Technology Education Teachers, NCATE/ITEA/CTTE

 

 

© Author: M. Annette Rose
URL: http://arose.iweb.bsu.edu/BSUCourses/Evaluation/resources.htm
Last Updated:
10/21/2009